The Chalder fatigue scale is widely used to measure physical and mental fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, but the constructs of the scale have not. Mult Scler. Apr;22(5) doi: / Epub Jul The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of. PDF | On Jan 4, , Craig Andrew Jackson and others published The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11).
|Published (Last):||11 November 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Chalder fatigue scale
The Fatigue Scale, sometimes referred to as the Chalder Fatigue Scale the CFQ—to differentiate it from chronic fatigue syndrome or CFSis a self-administered questionnaire for measuring the extent and fhalder of fatigue within both clinical and non-clinical, epidemiological populations. Effects of cognitive loading and force on upper trapezius fatigue.
Sensitization in the UK Supreme Court. The results support the validity of mental and physical fatigue subscales and the dropping of the “loss of interest” item in the item version of the fatigue scale. Loneliness and social isolation of military veterans: Discovery and identification of fatigue-related fayigue in human saliva. Post-traumatic growth in ex- military personnel: Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
Fatigue is one of the most distressing symptoms of multiple sclerosis MS. Factor 2 was correlated with difficulties in maintaining sleep.
Using the Likert scoring method, responses on the extreme left receive a score of 0, increasing to 1, 2 or 3 as they become more symptomatic. Predictors of fatigue and work ability in cancer survivors. Email alerts New issue alert. For Permissions, please email: The CFQ 11 has been used widely in studies ascertaining tiredness among working populations as well as patient groups and consistently fares extremely well against other longer and multidimensional tools [ 6 ].
More on this topic The psychological and physiological health effects of fatigue. Sign In or Create an Account. As a short questionnaire, phrased in simple English with a straightforward answering system, it provides a brief tool to measure both physical and psychological fatigue.
Related articles in Web of Science Google Scholar.
Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11) | Occupational Medicine | Oxford Academic
The CFQ measuring a composite of physical and mental fatigue severity i. Measuring MS fatigue poses a number of challenges.
We examined the constructs of the item fatigue scale in a sample of chronic fatigue syndrome patients through queetionnaire components analysis, followed by correlations with measures of subjective and objective cognitive performance, physiological measures of strength and functional work capacity, depression, anxiety, and subjective sleep difficulties.
The Likert scoring system allows for means and distributions to be calculated calder both the global total as well as the two sub-scales. The sub-scales of physical and psychological fatigue are questiohnaire used here, but rather the respondent receives a global binary fatigue score ranging from 0 to Exploring the validity of the Chalder Fatigue Scale in chronic fatigue syndrome.
Questionnaore furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Association of quality of life with disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Citing articles via Web of Science Cha,der advantage is that the CFQ 11 is used widely in occupational research and allows for straightforward comparisons between studies and populations. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation.
To evaluate the psychometric properties of an item fatigue severity measure, the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire CFQ in MS including validity of the factor structure, internal reliability, discriminant validity and sensitivity to change.
Tiredness and fatigue are important in both academic and applied occupational medicine—and the understanding of the link between them and employee health, performance, safety and general workability continues to grow. Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: The Chalder fatigue scale is widely used to measure physical and mental fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, but the constructs of the scale have not been examined in this patient sample.
Exploring the validity of the Chalder Fatigue scale in chronic fatigue syndrome.
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Reliability coefficients for the CFQ 11 have been high in studies of CFS patients [ 5 ] as well as occupational and general population research, ranging from 0. Factor 1 was correlated with subjective everyday cognitive difficulties, concentration difficulties, and a deficit in paired associate learning.
Factor 4 was correlated with interview and self-rated measures of depression. Assessment of fatigue among working people: Factor 3 was inversely correlated with grip strength, peak VO2, peak heart rate, and peak functional work capacity.
Questionnaire Reviews All Journals search questiknnaire.
chalder fatigue questionnaire | Science for ME
A bi-factor model with one general fatigue factor, incorporating two smaller group factors mental and physical fatigue had good model fit and appeared the most appropriate factor structure underlying the CFQ scale. The global score also spans two dimensions—physical fatigue measured by items 1—7 and psychological fatigue measured by items 8— The CFQ had high internal consistency, showed small to moderate correlations with impact of fatigue and mood, and was sensitive to change across low and high intensity behavioural interventions.
For all items, the least symptomatic answers are on the left of the response-set, providing an easy-to-understand checklist for respondents. Data analysis included confirmatory factor analysis to determine the factor structure and model fit, correlations to assess discriminant validity and effects sizes to determine sensitivity to change.
Physician gender differences in processing surgical risk features in videos of standardized patients.
The need for a reliable self-completion tool that can measure this subjective condition, either in extreme clinical cases or in routine day-to-day functioning, has never been greater [ 3 ].